
As future educators, we have to be able to connect the different Standards to our lessons, the books we choose, and the strategies we implement in our classrooms. As my educational journey continues, I learn more about different teaching strategies and approaches that I can use in my own future classroom. This week we have spent time reading and discussing the text
Culturally Responsive Design for English Learners: The UDL Approach by Patti Kelly Ralabate and Loui Lord Nelson. This text covers how teachers can "weave together two powerful frameworks- Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Culturally Responsive Teachers (CRT)- to design culturally responsive learning environments and lesson plans to meet the needs of English learners (Els)" (Nelson & Ralabate xi). Using the reading, a few additional sources, and my knowledge of the standards, I will examine which standards connect to the big ideas of
UDL and CRT as well as discuss how they relate to these ideas. I will then pick two standards from each of the following sets of standards:
Common Core Standards,
NCTE/ IRA Standards (both of which I have looked at in previous
blog posts) and the
TTSJ standards.
What Are the Big Ideas of UDL & CRT?
 |
| Universal Design of Learning |
Before I can relate the standards to the ideas surrounding CRT and UDL, I should first explain what exactly the big ideas and principles are. The book provides us with two large themes, stating that "a natural relationship exists between the two frameworks that focus on meeting diverse student learning and providing culturally responsive instruction" (N & R 10). But how do we do this? We learn from the book a key aspect of UDL takes into consideration the idea "that a curricula should be designed from the outset with built-in flexibility and choice" (N & R 5). In other words, educators use UDL through means of creating a classroom that has a curriculum that is flexible to student needs, and provides them with choices. A CRT is defined in the text by Geneva Gay as "using the cultural knowledge, prior experiences, frames of reference, and performance styles of ethnically diverse students to make learning encounters more relevant to and effective for them" (N & R 6). UDL and CRT can be connected to make a curriculum that is flexible, relatable, engaging, provide for student choice and use the student's prior knowledge to go deeper into subject matter. With this information in mind, I have chosen the following standards that I felt best connected to these ideas.
Here is a
document link to the specific standards I have chosen to look at.
Common Core Standards:
The two CCSS standards I have chosen to connect to are 9-10 2 and 9-10 6. Standard 9-10 6 refers to world literature and texts that discuss different cultures, this is important to CRT because it gives students a chance to look at culturally diverse texts. By choosing a wide range of texts, we give students an opportunity to read something that connects to their own culture, or learn about a totally new culture, creating a new awareness to those they interact with. Standard 9-10 2 can apply to UDL/ CRT because it asks students to use multiple sources from diverse media. Diverse media could include interviews with the students family or classmates that have knowledge on whatever topic the students are working on. The students can then cross reference the evidence they have gathered from family and classmates with their own research, the multiple sources can bring into question accuracy and credibility.
NCTE/ IRA Standards:
I felt that the two NCTE standards that connect most to the ideas revolving around UDL and CRT are standards 3 and 9. I found standard 3 aligning with the ideas around CRT because this standard asks students to use their prior knowledge, which is one of the components of CRT
(refer to Geneva Gay's definition). Standard 9 seems to connect with UDL and CRT as it expects students to respect diverse ideas surrounding culture and language. Many students already have diverse backgrounds, and by learning to respect other diverse cultures and languages, students will become more respectful in general.
TTSJ Standards:
This is the first time I have looked at the TTSJ standards, and I found them to be quite interesting. I also felt that a lot of these standards could apply to UDL and CRT, but the two I have chosen to focus on are 9-12 Identity 5 and 9-12 Diversity 9. The reason I felt that Identity 5 fit well with the concept of UDL and CRT is because it calls the students ability to recognize their culture and the dominant culture in terms of how they express themselves. If a student is not apart of the dominant culture, they are aware of how this has impacted their identity, which will hopefully make them aware of how other students are also impacted by their culture. This leads to an awareness of different cultures in general, and can then lead to students wanting to learn more about their culture or the cultures of their classmates. Diversity 9 ties into this because it requires students to "build connections with other people by showing them empathy, respect and understanding, regardless of our similarities and differences" which is important because it asks the students to be open minded when learning about new cultures. This all connects back to creating an engaging, and relevant curriculum based on the cultures and identities of the students, as well as encouraging students to connect their prior experiences with their cultures and apply it to their classmates. Using the students cultures, identities, and experiences, a teach can include relevant resources. thus creating a relevant curriculum.
